Public EU MRV data · Vessel-level intelligence
We put a number on your fleet's carbon inefficiency.
From verified public EU MRV submissions we quantify three compounding cost drivers per vessel — the running fuel-efficiency gap, CII charter-rate exposure, and EU ETS procurement savings. Every figure comes back with a vessel name, a cause, and a recommended action.
Get your fleet's brief → See the method ↓
The data is public. The interpretation is ours.
What a typical 7-vessel bulker fleet looks like
Total quantified opportunity ≈ $1,182,351 per year. Anonymized worked example below (real fleet, identities removed).
The method — no input required from your side
1 · Verified MRV data
We pull each vessel's verified EU MRV submission at vessel level — actual operating CO₂/nm, ETS-scope CO₂ and multi-year history. Public source; nothing to send us.
2 · Peer benchmarking
We place every ship against its type cohort (percentile) and the within-fleet median — observed difference, no cap applied, full gap shown.
3 · Three cost drivers
Fuel-efficiency gap ($), CII charter-rate exposure ($) and EU ETS procurement saving (€) — each attributed to a specific vessel with an action attached.
Peer band is a derived percentile of CO₂ intensity within the ship-type cohort — a commercial proxy, not an IMO CII rating or regulatory penalty. Figures are indicative; procurement and charter-rate values use documented market assumptions (e.g. 10% EUA forward-premium, Supramax Baltic base).
A worked example: one 7-vessel bulker fleet
All figures from a single analyzed fleet; vessels relabeled A–G. Fleet median CO₂/nm for the type = 275.
Fuel-efficiency gap — operating CO₂/nm vs within-fleet median
CII charter-rate exposure — per vessel, at current trajectory
EU ETS — 2025 in-scope surrender, due 30 Sep 2026
The one to watch — Vessel C's multi-year operating intensity
Beyond the headline — what we can quantify per vessel, lane and leg
Performance against design spec; where the gap is.
Fouling trend and its drag penalty.
Every master's call, priced.
What the fleet paid vs best conditions.
Arriving early, waiting at anchorage.
Efficiency-ranked lanes with a cause + action.
Speed optimisation by leg, ballast ratio by route and route efficiencies are available on request with further detailed data.
Self-serve · no input required for the first brief
Get your fleet's brief.
We run your company through the same MRV pipeline and return a 1-page brief: fuel-efficiency gap, CII charter-rate exposure and EU ETS procurement saving — each with a vessel name, cause and action. Send us your company (and any IMOs you'd like included); we'll build yours.
No operational data required for the initial brief — reconstructed from verified public EU MRV submissions.
Frequently asked questions
How is a vessel's CO₂ intensity calculated from MRV data?
We take each vessel's verified EU MRV submission (CO₂ per nautical mile) and benchmark it against the peer cohort for its ship type, using the within-fleet median as reference. The gap is expressed in kg CO₂/nm and priced at a VLSFO bunker cost.
Is this an official CII rating?
No. Our peer band is a derived percentile of CO₂ intensity within the ship-type cohort — a commercial proxy, not an IMO CII result or regulatory penalty.
What does EU ETS procurement actually save, and when is it due?
Forward-purchasing EUAs ahead of the surrender deadline saves against buying at spot. For 2025 in-scope emissions a portion (70% phase-in) is due by 30 September 2026; full coverage applies from 2026. The saving requires no operational change.
Do I need to provide any data?
No input is required for the initial brief — we reconstruct it from verified public EU MRV submissions at vessel level.
What's included in an expanded brief?
Main-engine performance vs ISO baseline, hull roughness over time, fuel cost per routing decision, bunker procurement efficiency, port idle/demurrage & dispatch, and fully-loaded cost per trade lane — each with a cause and recommended action.
Figures are indicative. Charter-rate sensitivity uses 2.5% × Supramax Baltic base on assumed laden days; ETS procurement at an indicative forward-premium assumption; fuel gap vs within-fleet median (no cap). Peer band = derived percentile proxy, not IMO CII.